Vol. 13 No. 2 (2022)

Institutional repositories and copyright in Greek academic libraries

Konstantinos Kyprianos
University of West Attica
Ekaterini Lygnou
University of West Attica

Published 2022-05-05


  • Institutional repositories,
  • Digital libraries,
  • Intellectual property,
  • Copyright clearance

How to Cite

Kyprianos, Konstantinos, and Ekaterini Lygnou. 2022. “Institutional Repositories and Copyright in Greek Academic Libraries”. JLIS.It 13 (2):92-112. https://doi.org/10.36253/jlis.it-449.


Institutional repositories were created to collect, preserve, and make available the academic institution's scientific output. The purpose of this study is to investigate and illustrate how Greek academic libraries with institutional repositories deal with copyright challenges. The study aims to identify and describe if institutional repository managers apply a certain copyright clearance protocol, the problems they encounter, and how they deal with them. For this study, a quantitative research method based on questionnaires was employed. The questionnaire consisted of twenty-nine (29) questions separated into three (3) sections and was sent to thirty-one (31) academic libraries.

According to the survey results, the majority of academic libraries have an institutional repository and provide open access to its content. It was found that academic institutional repositories face intellectual property difficulties. The biggest issue highlighted was a lack of knowledge of the notion of copyright. Finally, communication amongst libraries seems to be the foundation for developing a common policy and addressing the difficulties that have arisen in institutional repositories as a result of Greek copyright legislation limits.


Metrics Loading ...


  1. Björk, Bo-Christer. 2016. “The open access movement at a crossroad: Are the bigpublishers and academic social media taking over?”. Learned Publishing, 29: 131-134. doi: 10.1002/leap.1021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1021
  2. Brindley, Lynne J. 2006. “Joint funding councils’ libraries review group (the “Follett”) report: The contribution of the information technology sub-committee”. Program, 40(4): 311–314. https://doi.org/10.1108/00330330610707881 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00330330610707881
  3. Chantavaridou, Elisavet. 2009. “Open access and institutional repositories in Greece: progress so far”. OCLC Systems & Services: International digital library perspectives, 25(1): 47-59. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650750910931922 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/10650750910931922
  4. Dawson, Patricia H., and Sharon Q. Yang. 2016. “Institutional Repositories, Open Access and Copyright. What are the Practices and Implications?” Science & Technology Libraries, 35(4): 279–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2016.1224994 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2016.1224994
  5. Derakhshan, Maryam and Diljit Singh. 2011. “Integration of information literacy into the curriculum: a meta‐synthesis”. Library Review, 60(3): 218-229. https://doi.org/10.1108/00242531111117272 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00242531111117272
  6. Godwill, Enga Azeh. 2015. Fundamentals of Research Methodology : A Holistic Guide for Research Completion, Management, Validation and Ethics. [eBook]. New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
  7. Hanlon, Ann, and Marisa Ramirez. 2011. “Asking for permission: A survey of copyright workflows for institutional repositories”. Libraries and the Academy, 11(2): 683–702. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2011.0015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2011.0015
  8. Macklin, Lisa A. 2013. “Copyright and Institutional Repositories”. In The institutional repository : benefits and challenges. Retrieved from https://pid.emory.edu/ark:/25593/r9thx
  9. Marsh, Rebecca Mary. 2015. “The role of institutional repositories in developing the communication of scholarly research”. OCLC Systems & Services: International digital library perspectives, 31(4): 163-195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/OCLC-04-2014-0022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/OCLC-04-2014-0022
  10. Muir, A. 2019. Copyright and digital academic library development in the UK. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 51(3), 702–709. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000617732380 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000617732380
  11. Palmer, Carole L., Lauren C. Teffeau, and Mark P. Newton. 2008. “Strategies for institutional repository development: A case study of three evolving initiatives”. Library Trends, 57(2): 142–167. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.0.0033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.0.0033
  12. Prandoni, Claudio, Marlis Valentini and Martin Doerr. (2009). “Formalising a Model for Digital Rights Clearance”. In Agosti M., Borbinha J., Kapidakis S., Papatheodorou C., Tsakonas G. (eds) Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries. ECDL 2009. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5714). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04346-8_32 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04346-8_32
  13. Togia, Aspasia, Eleftheria Koseoglou, Sofia Zapounidou, and Nikolaos Tsigilis. 2018. “Open Access Infrastructure in Greece: Current Status, Challenges and Perspectives”. ELPUB 2018: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.4000/proceedings.elpub.2018.26 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/proceedings.elpub.2018.26
  14. Yoo, Suhyeon and Hyesun Kim. 2013. “Copyright clearing methods for electronic document delivery in Korea”. Interlending & Document Supply, 41(2): 54-58. doi: 10.1108/ILDS-02-2013-0007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ILDS-02-2013-0007