Articles

Rights Expression Languages: DRM vs. Creative Commons


Abstract


IT technologies and especially the progressive use of Internet have transformed the mechanism of knowledge transmission and its reproduction. We find, on the one hand, a model of knowledge circulation based on contract self-enforcement, through technological protection measures (TPMs). This kind of control is identified in Digital Rights Management (DRM), whose goal is to make the license terms for access and use of information recognizable by the software and equipment made for the use of information. Through DRM systems an automatic application (in personal computers, mobile phones, televisions, etc.) of contractual rules used for the distribution of digital contents is possible. On the other hand, stands the idea of Creative Commons Language which starts from the need to contrast the risk that a rigid and centralized control might colonize knowledge and above all to enhance the use of information technologies, Network, Web and new intermediaries (institutional archives, Internet search engines such as Google Books Search and Google Scholar, etc.). This latter aspect presents features of particular interest and is worthy of attention in this paper. The circulation of information on the Web becomes a key issue. Indeed, if the main purpose of Creative Commons is to ensure maximum diffusion and reuse of information and if the main space for the circulation of content is represented by the Web, the studies on cataloguing techniques, classification of information and the relevant rights in virtual spaces deserve special care. According to Creative Commons licenses (CCLs), the development and evaluation of knowledge are based on the collaboration of an open community of persons. The CC movement represents a landmark, not only from an ideological and contractual point of view, but also from a technological one: CC licenses, using some system technologies similar to those of DRM, appear to users in a readable form and also in a machine-readable form. The technologies which allow DRM systems to exercise strict control over information are developed by CC to facilitate the diffusion and the use of content, aiming at a flexible and decentralized control. The essay is intended to first provide a brief description of the IT technologies developed in DRM systems and by Creative Commons and then, for the translation of rules into IT code, to highlight the differences and, especially, the various achieved purposes.


Keywords


Copyright; DRM; Creative Commons; Licenses

Full Text:

Text


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4403/jlis.it-4593

NBN: http://nbn.depositolegale.it/urn%3Anbn%3Ait%3Aunifi-3800

References


Abelson, Hal. ccREL: The Creative Commons Rights Expression Language. 2008.

Bassi, Maria Cristina. La Catalogazione Delle Risorse Informative in Internet. Bibliografica, 2002. Print.

Becker, Eberhard et al., cur. Digital Rights Management. Springer, 2003. Print.

Berners-Lee, Tim, James Hendler, e Ora Lassila. «The Semantic Web». Scientific American 5 (2001) : 29-37. Print.

Boyle, James. The Public Domain. Yale University Press, 2009. Print.

Caso, Roberto. Digital Rights Management. Il Commercio Delle Informazioni Digitali Tra Contratto E Diritto D’autore. digital reprint. 2006.

---. Digital Rights Management. Problemi Teorici E Prospettive Applicative. University of Trento. Faculty of Law, 2008.

---. «Forme Di Controllo Dell’informazione Digitale». I Diritti Della Biblioteca. Cur da. C. Borgonovo & A. Scarazzato. Bibliografica, 2008.

---. «Le Licenze Software». Pacta Sunt Servanda 26 (2006) : n. pag. Print.

Chen, C. J. Alice, e Aaron Burstein. «Foreword to Symposium, The Law & Technology of Digital Rights Management,». Berkeley Technology Law Journal 18.2 (2003) : 487-494. Print.

Chisholm, Roderick M. A Realistic Theory of Categories? Cambridge University Press, 1996. Print.

Cohen, Julie E. «Cyberspace As/and Space». Columbia Law Review 107.1 (2007) : 210-256. Print.

Delgado, Jaime, e Egbert Dommering. «Regulating Technology: Code Is Not Law». Coding Regulating. Cur da. D. Bourcier, Egbert Dommering, & L.F. Asscher. T.M.C. Asser Press, 20032006. 11.

Dusollier, Severine. «The Master’s Tools V. the Master House: Creative Commons V. Copyright». Columbia Journal of Law & Arts 29 (2006) : 271. Print.

Eechoud, Mireille M. M. Van, Mireille M. M. Van Eechoud, e Brenda Van der Wal. «Characteristics of the Creative Commons Model». Creative Commons for Public Sector Information. 2007.

Farchy, Joëlle, e Fabrice Rochelandet. «Self-help Systems: Good Substitutes for Copyright or New Barriers to Competition?» The Economics of Copyright. Cur da. W. Gordon & R. Watt. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2003. 148-161. Print.

Felten, Edward W. «A Skeptical View of DRM and Fair Use». Communications of the ACM 46.4 (2003) : 56-59. Print.

Gadd, Elizabeth, Charles Oppenheim, e Steve Probets. «The Intellectual Property Rights Issues Facing Self-Archiving: Key Findings of the RoMEO Project». D-Lib Magazine 9.9 (2003) : n. pag.

Gambari, Stefano, e Mauro Guerrini. Definire E Catalogare Le Risorse Elettroniche. Bibliografica, 2002. Print.

Grondal, Lars. «DRM and Contract Terms». Indicare 2.12 (2006) : n. pag.

Guibault, Lucie. Copyright Limitations and Contract. An Analysis of the Contractual Overridability of Limitations on Copyright. Kluwer Law International, 2002. Print.

---. «Creative Commons: Struggling to ‘Keep It Simple’». Conference Proceedings KnowRight 08. Cur da. E. Schweighofer & P. Sint. Österreichische Computer Gesellschaft, 2008. Print.

Guth, Susanne. «Rights Expression Languages». Digital Rights Management. Cur da. Eberhard Becker et al. Springer, 2003. Print.

Guth, Susanne, e Mark Strembeck. «A Proposal for the Evolution of the ODRL Information Model». Proc. of the International Workshop on the Open Digital Rights Language (ODRL). Cur da. R. Iannella & S. Guth. 2004.

Hess, Charlotte, Elinor Ostrom, e Paolo Ferri, cur. La Conoscenza Come Bene Comune. Dalla Teoria Alla Pratica. Mondadori, 2009. Print.

Hoekstra, Rinke. Ontology Representation Design Patterns and Ontologies That Make Sense. IOS Press, 2009. Print.

Hoekstra, Rinke et al. «LKIF Core: Principled Ontology Development for the Legal Domain». Proceeding of the 2009 Conference on Law, Ontologies and the Semantic Web: Channelling the Legal Information Flood. IOS Press, 2009. 21-52. Print.

Kroon, Annemique M.E. de. «Protection of Copyright Management Information». Copyright and Electronic Commerce. Cur da. P. Bernt Hugenholtz. Kluwer Law International, 2000. 230. Print.

Lagoze, Carl et al. OAI-Rights White Paper, September 26, 2003. 2003.

Lessig, Lawrence. Code and Other Laws of Cyber Space. Basic Books, 1999. Print.

Loren, Lydia Pallas. «Building a Reliable Semicommons of Creative Works: Enforcement of Creative Commons Licenses and Limited Abandonment of Copyright». George Mason Law Review 14 (2007) : 271. Print.

Madison, Michael J. «Reconstructing the Software License». Loyola University Chicago Law Journal 35.275 (2003) : 311-312. Print.

Mayer-Schonberger, Viktor. «Beyond Copyright: Managing Information Rights with Drm». Denver University Law Review 84 (2006) : 181. Print.

Montagnani, M. Lillà, e Maurizio Borghi. Proprietà Digitale: Diritto D’autore, Nuove Tecnologie E Digital Rights Management. EGEA, 2006. Print.

Mulligan, Deirdre K., John Han, e Aaron J. Burstein. «How DRM-based Content Delivery Systems Disrupt Expectations of Personal Use». DRM ’03 Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Workshop on Digital Rights Management. ACM, 2003.

Pascuzzi, Giovanni, cur. Diritto E Tecnologie Evolute Del Commercio Elettronico. CEDAM, 2004. Print.

---. Il Diritto Dell’era Digitale. Tecnologie Informatiche E Regole Privatistiche. 2nd ed. Il Mulino, 2006. Print.

Paskin, Norman. «Components of DRM System, Identification and Metadata». Digital Rights Management. Cur da. Eberhard Becker. Springer, 2003. Print.

---. «Digital Object Identifier». Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences. Cur da. Marcia J. Bates & Mary Niles Maack. Taylor & Francis, 2010.

Reidenberg, Joel R. «‘Lex Informatica’. The Formulation of Information Policy Rules Through Technology». Texas Law Review 76.3 (1998) : 553. Print.

Rosenblatt, William, William Trippe, e Stephen Mooney. Digital Rights Management: Business and Technology. M&T Books, 2002. Print.

Rossi, Piercarlo. «Ontologie Applicate E Comparazione Giuridica». Rivista Critica Del Diritto Privato 2 (2004) : n. pag. Print.

Rubino, Rossella, Antonino Rotolo, e Giovanni Sartor. «An OWL Ontology of Fundamental Legal Concepts». Proceedings of Jurix 2006. IOS, 2006. Print.

Samuelson, Pamela. «DRM {and, or. Vs.} the Law». Communications of the ACM 46.4 (2003) : 41. Print.

---. «Embedding Technical Self-Help in Licensed Software». Communications of the ACM 40 (1997) : 13. Print.

---. «Intellectual Property and Contract Law for the Information Age». California Law Review 87.1 (1999) : 1. Print.

---. «Technological Protection for Copyrighted Works». Communications of the ACM (1999) : 7. Print.

Sartor, Giovanni. Corso Di Informatica Giuridica. Giappichelli, 2008. Print.

---. «Legal Concepts as Inferential Nodes and Ontological Categories». Artificial Intelligence and Law 17.3 (2009) : 217-251. Print.

Stefik, Mark. «Shifting the Possible: How Digital Property Rights Challenge Us to Rethink Digital Publishing». Berkeley Technology Law Journal 12.1 (1997) : 137-159. Print.

Weinberg, Jonathan. «Hardware-Based ID. Rights Management, and Trusted Systems». Stanford Law Review 52.5 (2000) : 1251-1281. Print.


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2011 Valentina Moscon

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Logo Università di FirenzeLogo EUMJLIS.it is a journal of the SAGAS Department, University of Florence, published by EUM, Edizioni Università di Macerata (Italy).

ISSN: 2038-1026

Openaire Logo DOAJ seal