Essays

Rights Information Infrastructures and Voluntary Stakeholders Agreements in Digital Library Programmes


Abstract


Rights management for digital library programs is affected by high transaction costs and this calls for new schemes of collective management. Voluntary Stakeholders Agreements (VSA) is proposed as a solution. However, there is a need to reshape the way of defining the scope of such agreements. In the past, the scope was set by limiting the type of uses licensed in the collective agreement, while other uses, pertaining the primary exploitation of works, remain in the sphere of direct management by the rightholder. In the agreements under discussion in several countries in relation to digital library initiatives, the scope is rather defined through limiting the type of works included in the agreement, while the licensed use is broad, including full making available in the Internet. A key distinction is the commercial status of a work, if it is in-print or out-of-print.Such new VSAs require innovative forms of managing of rights information, i.e. set of metadata referred to rights management. A significant part of transaction costs derives from the search of rightholders, and thus there is a trend to call for reducing or even abolishing the need for this search. However, the identification of the right status (public domain vs. in-copyright) and the commercial status (in print vs. out of print) requires a title by title management of information, which is inevitable because of the characteristics of the emerging VSAs. The proper rightholder search cost should be assessed as an additional cost to something that is in the nature of the agreements. The paper tries to set the terms and conditions to achieve this assessment, and to figure out practical solutions to the problem.


Keywords


Digital libraries; Digitization projects; Copyright; Voluntary Stakeholders Agreements; Rights Information Infrastructure

Full Text:

PDF


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4403/jlis.it-4539

NBN: http://nbn.depositolegale.it/urn%3Anbn%3Ait%3Aunifi-3795

References


AIE - Associazione Italiana Editori. «Analysis of commercial availability of important Italian authors’ works in the Settlement Database». 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1389/090907_aie_hearing. Online.

European Commission. «Communication on Copy- right in the Knowledge Economy». 19 Ott. 2009. http://ec.europa.eu/internal market/copyright/docs/copyright- infso/20091019532_en.pdf. Online.

–––. «Creative Content in a European Digital Single Market: Challenges for the Future, A Reflection Document of DG INFSO and DG MARKT 14 ». http://ec.europa.eu/avpolicy/docs/other actions/col 2009/reflection paper.pdf. Online.

–––. «Green Paper on Copyright in the Kno- wledge Economy». 16 Lug. 2008. http://eur- lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2008:0466:FIN:EN:PDF. Online.

Gervais, Daniel J. e Alana Maurushat. «Fragmented Copyright, Fragmented Management: Proposals to Defrag Copyright Management». Canadian Journal of Law and Technology 2. (2003): 15–23. A stampa.

Koskinen-Olsson, Tarja. «Collective Management in the Nordic Countries». Collective Management of Copyright and Related Rights. A cura di Daniel Gervais. Kluwer Law International, 2006. 283–306. A stampa.

Lang, Bernard. Orphan Works and the Google Book Search Set- tlement: An International Perspective, INRIA & AFUL. 2009. http://pauillac.inria.fr/ lang/ecrits/liste/orphan-gbs.pdf. Online.

Mara, Kaitlin. «High Copyright Transaction Costs Cause ’Friction’, Google Economist Tells WIPO». Intellectual Property Watch. (16 Set. 2010). A stampa.

Riis, Thomas e Jens Schovsbo. «Extended Collective Licenses and the Nordic Experience. It’s a Hybrid but is it a Volvo or a Lemon?» Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts 33. (4 2010). A stampa.

Rognstad, Ole-Andreas. «The Nordic Model: Extended Collective Licenses and Its Relation to International Instruments». European Free Trade Asso- ciation, Brussels. 30 Set. 2010. www.efta.int/eea/eea-news/2010-09-30-efta- copyright-seminar.aspx. Online.

Skarstein, Vigdis Moe. «Strategies for a Digital National Library». 23–27 ago. 2009, Milan. www.ifla.org/annual-conference/ifla75/index.htm. Online.

–––. «The bookshelf.no : A matter of Intellectual Property Right». Euro- pean Free Trade Association, Brussels. 30 Set. 2010. www.efta.int/eea/eea- news/2010-09-30-efta-copyright-seminar.aspx. Online.

UK Intellectual Property Office. © the way ahead: A Strategy for Copyright in the Digital Age. 2010. http://www.ipo.gov.uk/c-strategy-digitalage.pdf. Online.

Van Gompel, Stef. «Unlocking the Potential of Pre-Existing Content: How to Address the Issue of Orphan Works in Europe?» International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 38. (2007): 669–702. A stampa.

Varian, Hal R. «Copying and Copyright». Journal of Economic Perspectives 19. (2 2005): 121–138. A stampa.

–––. «Copyright term extension and orphan works». Industrial and Corporate Change 15. (6 2006): 965–980. A stampa.

–––. The Google Library Project. 2006. A stampa.


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2010 Piero Attanasio

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Logo Università di FirenzeLogo EUMJLIS.it is a journal of the SAGAS Department, University of Florence, published by EUM, Edizioni Università di Macerata (Italy).

ISSN: 2038-1026

Openaire Logo DOAJ seal