Knowledge Representation of digital Hermeneutics of archival and literary Sources


Scholarly analysis of archival, library, and literary sources results in a variety of digital artefacts meant to foster knowledge discovery and new research enquiries. Guidelines and standards to formally represent disciplinary information are available (e.g. XML schemas, ontologies, vocabularies). However, digital artefacts rarely address reusable structured information on the hermeneutical approach adopted by scholars when validating hypotheses. As a consequence, reproducibility and assessment of research results is hampered, and comparing online contradictory information is still a hard task. In this work we show how to leverage Semantic Web technologies in a high-level, portable data model for representing hermeneutical aspects related to cross-disciplinary analysis of archival and literary sources. We showcase three representative scenarios in the Cultural Heritage domain where the model is applied, and we describe benefits and limits of our solution.


Digital hermeneutics; Semantic Web; Data model; Archival linked data; Library linked data.

Full Text:





Batini, Carlo, Cinzia Cappiello, Chiara Francalanci, and Andrea Maurino. 2009. “Methodologies for Data Quality Assessment and Improvement”. ACM Computing Surveys 41 (3):1–52.

Bizer, Christian, and Radoslaw Oldakowski. 2004. “Using Context-and Content-Based Trust Policies on the Semantic Web”. In Proceedings of the 13th International World Wide Web Conference on Alternate Track Papers Posters, 228–229. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.

Bowen, Glenn A. 2009. “Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method”. Qualitative Research Journal 9 (2):27–40.

Capurro, Rafael. 2000. “Hermeneutics and the Phenomenon of Information”. Metaphysics, Epistemology, and Technology. Research in Philosophy and Technology 19:79–85.

Carboni, Nicola, and Livio de Luca. 2019. “An Ontological Approach to the Description of Visual and Iconographical Representations”. Heritage 2 (2):1191–1210.

Carroll, Jeremy J., Christian Bizer, Pat Hayes, and Patrick Stickler. 2005. “Named Graphs”. Journal of Web Semantics 3 (4):247–67.

Crofts, Nick, Martin Doerr, Tony Gill, Stephen Stead, and Matthew Stiff. 2011. “Definition of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model”. Version 5.0.4. ICOM/CIDOC CRM Special Interest Group.

Daquino, Marilena. 2019a. “Art Historical Photo Archives and Semantic Web : Problems, Resources and Research Lines”. JLIS.It 10 (2):37–47.

———. 2019b. Mining Authoritativeness in Art Historical Photo Archives. Studies on the Semantic Web 40. Amsterdam: IOSPress.

———. 2020. “A Computational Analysis of Art Historical Linked Data for Assessing Authoritativeness of Attributions”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 71 (7):757–69.

Daquino, Marilena, Francesca Giovannetti, and Francesca Tomasi. 2019. “Linked Data per Le Edizioni Scientifiche Digitali. Il Workflow Di Pubblicazione Dell’edizione Semantica Del Quaderno Di Appunti Di Paolo Bufalini”. Umanistica Digitale 3 (7).

Daquino, Marilena, Francesca Mambelli, Silvio Peroni, Francesca Tomasi, and Fabio Vitali. 2017. “Enhancing Semantic Expressivity in the Cultural Heritage Domain: Exposing the Zeri Photo Archive as Linked Open Data”. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 10 (4):1–21.

Daquino, Marilena, and Francesca Tomasi. 2015. “Historical Context Ontology (HiCO): A Conceptual Model for Describing Context Information of Cultural Heritage Objects”. In Metadata and Semantics Research, edited by Emmanouel Garoufallou, Richard J. Hartley, and Panorea Gaitanou, 544:424–36. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

De Waard, Anita, and Jodi A. Schneider. 2012. “Formalising Uncertainty: An Ontology of Reasoning, Certainty and Attribution (ORCA)”. In Joint Workshop on Semantic Technologies Applied to Biomedical Informatics and Individualized Medicine, 930:8–15.

Felicetti, Achille, and Francesca Murano. 2017. “Scripta Manent: A CIDOC CRM Semiotic Reading of Ancient Texts”. International Journal on Digital Libraries 18 (4):263–270.

Gil, Yolanda, and Donovan Artz. 2007. “Towards Content Trust of Web Resources”. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 5 (4):227–39.

Ginzburg, Carlo. 1979. “Clues: Roots of a Scientific Paradigm”. Theory and Society 7 (3):273–88.

Groth, Paul, Andrew Gibson, and Jan Velterop. 2010. “The Anatomy of a Nanopublication”. Information Services & Use 30 (1–2):51–56.

Lehnert, Wendy C., Hayward R. Alker, and Daniel K. Schneider. 1983. “The Heroic Jesus: The Affective Plot Structure of Toynbee’s Christus Patiens”. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Computers and the Humanities, edited by Sarah K. Burton and Douglas D. Short, 358–367. Rockville: Computer Science Press.

Maas, Paul. 1972. Critica Del Testo. Firenze: Le Monnier.

Maiatsky, Michail, Alexey Boyarsky, Natalia Boyarskaya, Ekaterina Velmezova, and Michael Piotrowski. 2018. “VICOGLOSSIA: Annotatable and Commentable Library as a Bridge between Reader and Scholar (a Proof of Concept Study: Early Soviet Philological Culture)”. Umanistica Digitale, no. 2:161–84.

Mallery, John C., Roger Hurwitz, and Gavan Duffy. 1986. “Hermeneutics: From Textual Explication to Computer Understanding?” A.I. memo 871. MIT artificial intelligence laboratory.

Moreau, Luc, Paul Groth, James Cheney, Timothy Lebo, and Simon Miles. 2015. “The Rationale of PROV”. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 35:235–57.

Morelli, Giovanni. 1883. Italian Masters in German Galleries : A Critical Essay on the Italian Pictures in the Galleries of Munich, Dresden, Berlin. Translated by Louise M. Richter. London: G. Bell and Sons.

Moretti, Franco. 2013. Distant Reading. London: Verso.

Myers, Michael D., and David Avison. 2002. “An Introduction to Qualitative Research in Information Systems”. In Qualitative Research in Information Systems: A Reader, 3–12. SAGE Publications.

Naumann, Felix, and Claudia Rolker. 2005. “Assessment Methods for Information Quality Criteria”. In Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Information Quality, 148–162.

Pasquali, Giorgio. 1952. Storia Della Tradizione e Critica Del Testo. Firenze: Le Monnier.

Peroni, Silvio, and David Shotton. 2018. “The SPAR Ontologies”. In The Semantic Web – ISWC 2018, 119–36. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Ramsay, Stephen. 2010. “The Hermeneutics of Screwing Around; or What You Do with a Million Books”. In Playing with Technology in History Conference. Niagara-on-the-Lake.

Rieh, Soo Young. 2002. “Judgment of Information Quality and Cognitive Authority in the Web”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53 (2):145–61.

Romele, Alberto, Marta Severo, and Paolo Furia. 2018. “Digital Hermeneutics: From Interpreting with Machines to Interpretational Machines”. AI & SOCIETY, 1–14.

Sanderson, Robert, Paolo Ciccarese, Herbert Van de Sompel, Shannon Bradshaw, Dan Brickley, Leyla Jael Garcia Castro, and Timothy Clark. 2013. “Web Annotation Data Model”. W3C community draft.

Schneider, Jodi, Tudor Groza, and Alexandre Passant. 2013. “A Review of Argumentation for the Social Semantic Web”. Semant. Web 4 (2):159–218.

Stegmüller, Wolfgang. 1977. “The So-Called Circle of Understanding”. In Collected Papers on Epistemology, Philosophy of Science and History of Philosophy, 1–25. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

Van Zundert, Joris J. 2016. “Screwmeneutics and Hermenumericals: The Computationality of Hermeneutics”. In A New Companion to Digital Humanities, edited by Susan Schreibman, Ray Siemens, and John Unsworth, 331–47. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Wilkinson, Mark D., Michel Dumontier, IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg, Gabrielle Appleton, Myles Axton, Arie Baak, Niklas Blomberg, et al. 2016. “The FAIR Guiding Principles for Scientific Data Management and Stewardship”. Scientific Data 3 (1): 160018.

Wilson, Patrick. 1983. Second-Hand Knowledge: An Inquiry into Cognitive Authority. Westport: Greenwood Press.

Zaveri, Amrapali, Anisa Rula, Andrea Maurino, Ricardo Pietrobon, Jens Lehmann, and Sören Auer. 2016. “Quality Assessment for Linked Data: A Survey”. Semantic Web 7 (1):63–93.

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 Marilena Daquino, Valentina Pasqual, Francesca Tomasi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. is a journal of UNIFI-SAGAS published by EUM - edizioni università di macerata