Open Access as a new Paradigm. An inevitable Evolution?


After almost 20 years from the first Berlin Declaration, the end of 2018 saw a new impulse in open access to publications (and not only) with the launch of Plan S by the Coalition S and with the announcement of the launch of “European Open Science Cloud”. The two events are part of a new scenario that sees, in particular, publishers strongly urged by academic and government institutions to take the definitive step towards a true Open Science. After the transition from paper to electronic, everyone is called to a new challenge: to find one (or more) economically sustainable models that are no longer based on the subscription model but on that of publications. In this highly unstable phase, we speak generically of “transformative agreements”. Some characteristics and problems are here analyzed.


Open Access; Scientific Publishing; Transformative Agreements; Plan S.

Full Text:

TESTO (Italiano)



Baccini, Alberto. 2010. Valutare la ricerca scientifica: uso e abuso degli indicatori bibliometrici. Bologna: Il Mulino.

Baccini, Alberto, Giuseppe De Nicolao, e Eugenio Petrovich. 2019. “Citation gaming induced by bibliometric evaluation: A country-level comparative analysis”. PLOS ONE 14 (9): e0221212.

Barker, Alex, e Patricia Nilsson. 2020. “Elsevier forced to begin a new chapter”. Financial Times, 12 febbraio 2020.

Björk, Bo-Christer. 2017. “Growth of hybrid open access, 2009–2016”. PeerJ 5: e3878.

Bosch, Stephen, Barbara Albee, e Sion Romaine. 2019. “Deal or No Deal: Periodicals Price Survey 2019”. Library Journal.

Brainard, Jeffrey. 2019. “Facing Plan S, publishers may set papers free”. Science 364 (6441):620.

Dal‐Ré, Rafael. 2019. “Plan S: Funders Are Committed to Open Access to Scientific Publication”. European Journal of Clinical Investigation 49 (6): e13100.

Else, Holly. 2019. “High-profile subscription journals critique Plan S”. Nature.

European Mathematical Society. 2019. “Feedback from the European Mathematical Society on the Guidance on the Implementation of Plan S”.

European Scientists. 2018. “Reaction of Researchers to Plan S: Too Far, Too Risky: Plan S open letter”.

Gómez-Fernández, Juan C. 2019. “Plan S for publishing science in an open access way: not everyone is likely to be happy”. Biophysical Reviews 11 (6):841–42.

Green, Toby. 2019. “Is open access affordable? Why current models do not work and why we need internet-era transformation of scholarly communications”. Learned Publishing 32 (1):13–25.

Guzik, Tomasz J, e Amrita Ahluwalia. 2019. “Plan S: in Service or Disservice to Society?” European Heart Journal 40 (12):949–52.

HighWire Press. 2019. “Plan S: the options for publishers”. White paper.

Hinchliffe, Lisa Janicke. 2019. “From One Big Deal to Another? Libraries in an Open Access Age”. [Slides].

Hunter, Philip. 2020. “The deal with DEAL for open access”. EMBO reports 21 (1).

International Association of STM Publishers. 2018. STM statement on Plan S: Accelerating the transition to full and immediate Open Access to scientific publications.

International Mathematical Union. 2018. “Further developments in Open Access”.

Johnson, Rob. 2019. “From coalition to commons: Plan S and the future of scholarly communication”. Insights: the UKSG journal 32: 5.

Johnson, Rob, Anthony Watkinson, e Michael Mabe. 2018. “The STM Report: An overview of scientific and scholarly publishing”. 5ed. The Hague: STM: International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers.

Khoo, Shaun Yon-Seng. 2019. “Article Processing Charge Hyperinflation and Price Insensitivity: An Open Access Sequel to the Serials Crisis”. LIBER Quarterly 29 (1):1–18.

Machovec, George. 2019a. “Publish and Read Mandates May Change the Future of Journal Publishing”. Journal of Library Administration 59 (3):325–33.

———. 2019b. “Strategies for Transformational Publish and Read Agreements in North America”. Journal of Library Administration 59 (5):548–55.

———. 2020. “Selected Tools and Services for Analyzing and Managing Open Access Journal Transformative Agreements”. Journal of Library Administration 60 (3):301–7.

MacKenzie, Smith, Ivy Anderson, Bo-Christer Bjork, Mark McCabe, David Solomon, Greg Tananbaum, Carol Tenopir, e Matthew Willmott. 2016. “Pay It Forward: Investigating a Sustainable Model of Open Access Article Processing Charges for Large North American Research Institutions”.

Purton, Mary, Francesco Michelangeli, e László Fésüs. 2019. “Will Plan S put learned societies in jeopardy?” FEBS Letters 593 (4):383–85.

Research Information Network. 2015. “RIN monitoring the transition to open access: a report for the Universities UK Open Access Co-ordination Group”.

Sayre, Steve, e Steven Ottogalli. 2019. “Plan S: what does it mean for authors and researchers?” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 17 (5):247.

Schimmer, Ralf, Kai Karin Geschuhn, e Andreas Vogler. 2015. “Disrupting the subscription journals’ business model for the necessary large-scale transformation to open access”.

Shamash, Katie. 2016. “Article processing charges (APCs) and subscriptions: Monitoring open access costs”. [Report]. JISC.

Suber, Peter. 2006. “Creating an intellectual commons through open access”. Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice.

Unione Matematica Italiana. 2019. “Accesso aperto alla letteratura scientifica (open access)”.

University of California. 2019. “Negotiating with scholarly journal publishers: A toolkit from the University of California”. Office of Scholarly Communication (blog). 2019.

Wesel, Maarten van. 2016. “Evaluation by Citation: Trends in Publication Behavior, Evaluation Criteria, and the Strive for High Impact Publications”. Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (1):199–225.

Wise, Alicia, e Lorraine Estelle. 2020. “How society publishers can accelerate their transition to open access and align with Plan S”. Learned Publishing 33 (1):14–27.

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 Tessa Piazzini

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. is a journal of the SAGAS Department, University of Florence, published by EUM, Edizioni Università di Macerata (Italy).