Semantic Indexing of Musical Resources. The Application of the Nuovo soggettario System and its Implementation with a specialized Terminology


The goal of this study is to present an overview of issues related to subject indexing of musical resources and also to describe what ‘subject’ access means in this domain. In other Countries subject indexing is realized with a lot of initiatives throughout the years, such as LCSH, the Music Thesaurus Project, Musaurus, and Rilm; in Italy the Nuovo Soggettario Thesaurus could be the tool for this practice. As a matter of fact, The Nuovo Soggettario Thesaurus comply with international standards and is freely accessible on the Web. It is steadily growing thanks to the efforts of the National Library of Florence (BNCF) as well as the external collaboration of several institutions. The Thesaurus, organized in a hierarchical arrangement, with a thoroughly faceted and synthetically list of terms, provides many links which allow connections to other knowledge organization tools as well as archival and museum resources. The Thesaurus structure is based on four conceptual categories which contain classes of concepts with common characteristics. Furthermore, terms are provided with a rich apparatus of notes and a dense network of semantic relationships (BT, NT, RT) that clarify the meaning of the terms. The Thesaurus is integrated with the BNCF’s opac and other libraries’ one, which use it in the Servizio Bibliotecario Nazionale (SBN) and users can browse through vocabulary to the bibliographic records. A large number of terms has a cross-language equivalence relationship with Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) preferred terms, linked at “Equiv. LCSH”. This article aims to present the possibility of enriching the terminological heritage of the Thesaurus with musical terminology. In addition, a case study (Sinfonie term) is presented which describes some interesting peculiarities about the musical terms. The management of the term has involved the examination of the scope note (SN) which is usually used for polysemi-terms. The case of Sinfonie is a significant example of this because of the evolution that the form has undergone over the centuries. This study also illustrates how a general thesaurus could be profitably employed also in a specific domain as well as how the results could be improved if librarians and specialists collaborate.


Indexing of Musical Resources; Music Subject Headings; Nuovo soggettario; Thesauri; Cataloging of Music.

Full Text:

TESTO (Italiano)



Aitchison, Jean, Alan Gomersall, and Ralph Ireland. 1961. Thesaurosfacet: a thesaurus & faceted classification for engineering & related subjects. Leicester: English Electric Co. Ltd.

Ballestra, Laura. 2010. “Multiculturalità e thesauri multilingue: problemi e prospettive alla luce delle Guidelines for multilingual thesauri di IFLA.” In I workshop di Teca: 8 focus per le biblioteche, ed. by Waldemaro Morgese e Maria Abenante, Roma: AIB, 151–160.

Beghtol, Claire. 1994. The classification of fiction: the development of a system based on theoretical principles. Metuchen, N.J.: Scarecrow Press.

Bianchini, Carlo e Mauro Guerrini. 2014. Introduzione a RDA. Milano: Bibliografica.

Biblioteca Nazionale Centrale di Firenze. 2006a. Nuovo soggettario. Guida al sistema italiano di indicizzazione per soggetto. Prototipo del thesaurus. Milano: Bibliografica.

___2006b. Nuovo soggettario. Thesaurus multidisciplinare.

Blanca, Calvo. “Navega? Pues es una biblioteca.” Una vuelta por la red. 17 November 2008. Accessed January 30 2020.

Broughton, Vanda. 2008. Costruire thesauri: strumenti per indicizzazione e metadati semantici, edizione italiana a cura di Piero Cavalieri, traduzione di Laura Ballestra e Luisa Venuti. Milano: Bibliografica.

Buth, Olga. 1975. “Scores and recordings.” Library trends, 23:427–450. DOI:

Byrd, Donald, and Tim Crawford. 2002. “Problems of Music Information Retrieval in the Real World.” Information Processing and Management, 38:249–272. DOI: 10.1016/S0306-4573(01)00033-4.

Cheti Alberto, and Federica Paradisi. 2008. “Facet analysis in the development of a general controlled vocabulary.” Axiomathes, 18:223–241. DOI: 10.1007/s10516-008-9033-4.

Collison, Robert Lewis. 1953. Indexes and indexing: a guide to the indexing of books, and collections of books, periodicals, music, gramophone records, films and other material, with a reference section and suggestions for further reading. London: Benn.

Crociani, Laura, Maria Chiara Giunti, ed Elisabetta Viti. 2016. “Trent’anni di Dewey in Italia: il ruolo della Biblioteca nazionale centrale di Firenze e i nuovi sviluppi sul fronte dell’interoperabilità con altri strumenti di indicizzazione semantica.” AIB studi, 56:87–101. Accessed January 30, 2020. DOI:

Gnoli, Claudio. 2007. “C’era una volta un soggetto.” AIB notizie, 19:2–4.

Graziosi, Lauro. 2017. La qualità del “sentire”. Sesto San Giovanni: Mimesis.

Gross, Tina Arlene, Taylor, G., and Joudrey, Daniel N. 2015. “Still a lot to lose: the role of controlled vocabulary in keyword searching.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 53:1–39. Accessed January 30, 2020. DOI: 2014.917447.

Guerrini, Mauro, e Carlo Bianchini. 2016. Manuale RDA. Milano: Editrice bibliografica.

Guerrini, Mauro e Lucia Sardo. 2018. IFLA Library Reference Model: un modello concettuale per le biblioteche del XXI secolo. Milano: Editrice bibliografica.

Harrold, Ann, and Lea Graham. 1991. Musaurus: a music thesaurus. A new approach to organizing music information. London: Music Press.

ICCU (Istituto centrale per il catalogo unico delle biblioteche italiane e per le informazioni bibliografiche). 2012. Guida alla catalogazione in SBN. Musica: musica e libretti a stampa, registrazioni sonore, video e risorse elettroniche musicali. Roma: ICCU.

___. 2014. Titolo uniforme musicale: norme per la redazione. Roma: ICCU.

___. 2018. Norme di catalogazione delle risorse musicali non pubblicate. Roma: ICCU.

IFLA. 1971. Statement of principles adopted at the International Conference on Cataloguing Principles, Paris, October. London: IFLA.

IFLA. 2009. International Statement on Cataloguing Principles,

IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. 1998. Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR): Final Report. München: K.G. Saur.

___. 2000. Requisiti funzionali per record bibliografici: rapporto conclusivo. Roma: ICCU.

IFLA Working group on Functional Requirements and Numbering of Authority Records (FRANAR). 2009. Functional requirements for authority data (FRAD): a conceptual model, Final report, december 2008. A cura di Glenn E. Patton. München: K.G. Saur.

___. 2010. Requisiti funzionali per i dati di autorità: un modello concettuale. Relazione finale, dicembre 2008. Roma: ICCU.

IFLA Working Group on the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Records (FRSAR). 2011. Functional requirements for subject authority data (FRSAD): a conceptual model. Edited by Marcia Lei Zeng, Maja Zumer and Athena Salaba. Berlin: De Gruiter Saur.

Inskip, Charles, Andrew Macfarlane, and Pauline Raffaerty. 2008. “Meaning, communication, music: Towards a revised communication model.” Journal of Documentation, 64:687–706. Accessed January 30, 2020. DOI: 10.1108/00220410810899718.

Iseminger, Beth, Nancy Lorimer, Casey Mullin, and Hermine Vermeij. 2017. “Faceted vocabularies for music: a new era in resource discovery.” Quarterly Journal of the MLA. 73:409–31. Accessed January 30, 2020. DOI: 10.1353/not.2017.0000.

ISO5963:1985 – Documentation, methods for examining documents, determining their subjects, and selecting indexing terms. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 1985.

ISO5964:1985 – Documentation, guidelines for the establishment and development of multilingual thesauri. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 1985.

ISO2788:1986 – Documentation, guidelines for the establishment and development of monolingual thesauri. Documentation, principes directeurs pour l’établissement et le développement de thesaurus monolingue. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 1986.

ISO25964/1:2011 – Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies. Part 1: Thesauri for information retrieval. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2011.

ISO25964/2:2013 – Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies. Part 2: Interoperability with other vocabularies. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2013.

Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA. 2013. RDA: Resource Description and Access.

Kelly, Elizabeth Joan. 2010. “Music indexing and retrieval: current problem.” The Indexer, 28:163–166. Accessed January 30, 2020. DOI: 10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.3206098.

Kyle, Barbara. 1958. “Towards classification for social science literature.” Journal of the American society for information science and technology. 9:168–83.

Lai, Catherine. “Usability and Music Information Retrieval (MIR).” Semantic Scholar.

Lee, Jin Ha. 2010. “Analysis of user needs and information features in natural language queries seeking music information.” Journal of the American society for information science and technology, 61:1025–45. DOI: 10.1002/asi.21302.

Lévy, Pierre. 1996. L’intelligenza collettiva. Milano: Feltrinelli.

Library Association, and Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals (Great Britain). 2010. Resource Description & Access: RDA. Chicago: American Library Association.

Lucarelli, Anna. 2008. “Quando una collezione speciale chiede ospitalità ad una grande Biblioteca.” In Piccoli scritti di Biblioteconomia per Luigi Crocetti, promossi, raccolti e ordinati da Piero Innocenti, curati da Cristina Cavallaro, 30–35. Manziana: Vecchiarelli.

___. 2017. “Biblioteche digitali e specialisti del mondo antico. Collaborazioni nell’ambito dell’indicizzazione e della ricerca semantica.” In Strumenti digitali e collaborativi per le Scienze dell’antichità, a cura di Paolo Mastandrea, 2019–229. Venezia: Edizioni Ca’ Foscari-Digital Publishing.

Lucarelli, Anna, and Elisabetta Viti. 2015. “Florence-Washington round trip: ways and intersections between semantic indexing tools in different languages.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 0:1–16. Accessed January 30, 2020.

MacFarlane, Andrew. 2016. “Knowledge organisation and its role in multimedia Information Retrieval.” Knowledge Organization, 43:180–83. Accessed January 30, 2020. DOI: 10.5771/0943-7444-2016-3-180.

McKnight, Mark. 2012. “Are we there yet? Toward a workable controlled vocabulary for music.” Fontes Artis musicae, 59: 286–92.

McLane, Alexander. 1996. “Music as information.” Annual review of information science and technology, 31:225–62.

McLuhan, Marshall. 2001. Understanding media: the extensions of man. London: Routledge.

Myers, Jane A. 1995. “Music: special characteristics for indexing and cataloguing.” The Indexer, 19:269–70. Accessed January 30, 2020.

Motta, Marta, e Dario Rodighiero. 2010. “Il Thesaurus del Nuovo soggettario interpreta SKOS.” AIDA informazioni: rivista di scienze dell’informazione, 3/4:75–89. Accessed January 30, 2020. DOI: 10.1400/212474.

Music Library Association. Music Thesaurus Project Working Group. 1989. “Improving access to music: a report of the MLA Music Thesaurus Project Working Group.” Notes, 45:714–21.

Perry, Helga. 1989. “Musical bumps: indexing musical term.” The Indexer, 16:251–253. Accessed January 30, 2020.

Prince, Harry. 1985. “Subject access to jazz and popular music material of Library of Congress catalog records.” Fontes Artes Musicae, 32:45–50.

RDA: Resource Description & Access. Version April 2014. Ed. italiana a cura dell’Istituto centrale per il catalogo unico delle biblioteche italiane e per le informazioni bibliografiche. Roma: ICCU, 2015.

Redfern, Brian. 1978. Organizing music in libraries. London: Bingley.

Riva, Pat, Patrick Le Boeuf, and Maja Zumer. 2017. IFLA Library Reference Model (LRM). March 2017. IFLA.

Riva, Pat. 2018. The IFLA Library Reference Model. Lectio magistralis in library science = Il modello concettuale IFLA Library Reference Model. Lectio magistralis in biblioteconomia. Fiesole (Firenze): Casalini Libri.

Saarti, Jarmo. 1999. “Fiction indexing and the development of fiction thesauri.” Journal of librarianship and information science, 31:85–92. Accessed January 30, 2020.

Santoro, Michele. 2007. “Questa sera si cataloga a soggetto. Breve analisi delle folksonomie in prospettiva bibliotecaria.” Bibliotime, 10:2–8. Accessed January 30, 2020.

Shatford, Sara. 1986. “Analyzing the subject of a picture: a theoretical approach.” Cataloging & Classification Quaterly, 6:39–62. Accessed January 30, 2020.

SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System Reference. 2009. Cambridge, Mass.: W3C.

Smiraglia, Richard. 1989. Music cataloging: the bibliographic control of printed and recorded music in libraries. Englewood, Colorado: Libraries Unlimited.

Stoll, Clifford. 1996. Miracoli virtuali. Le false promesse di Internet e delle autostrade dell’informazione. Milano: Garzanti.

Svenonius, Elaine. 1994. “Access to nonbook materials: the limits of subject indexing for visual and aural languages.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45:600–606. Accessed January 30, 2020.<600::AID-ASI15>3.0.CO;2-6.

___. 2008. Il fondamento intellettuale dell’organizzazione dell’informazione. Firenze: Le Lettere.

The Harvard Dictionary of Music, 4th ed., s.v. “subject.” Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2003.

Tillet, Barbara B. 2016. “RDA, or, the long journey of the catalog to the Digital Age.”, 7:1–18. Accessed January 30, 2020. DOI:

UNI ISO5963:1989 – Documentazione. Metodi per l’analisi dei documenti, la determinazione del loro soggetto e la selezione dei termini di indicizzazione. Roma: Ente nazionale di unificazione, 1989.

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 Michela Grossi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. is a journal of the SAGAS Department, University of Florence, published by EUM, Edizioni Università di Macerata (Italy).