Articles

When Linked Data is (not) enough. Cataloguing Tools between Obsolescence and Innovation


Abstract


The irruption of the informative space of Web, as new manner to disseminate and share information content, has imposed in the last years an important rethinking of international bibliographic production in its theoretical and methodological basis. In this paper we try to understand the evolutive way of the cataloguing tools though the identification and definition of several change factors (technical and functional): which could be in the next future the new challenges related to the creation and treatment of information?


Keywords


Bibliographic control; Opac; Linked data; Information retrieval.

Full Text:

TEXT


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4403/jlis.it-12623

References


Barbera, Michele. 2013. “Linked (open) data at web scale. Research, social and engineering challenges in the digital humanities.” JLIS.it 4, 1:91–101. DOI: 10.4403/jlis.it-6333.

Bennett, Rick, Brian F. Lavoie, and Edward T. O’Neill. 2003. “The concept of a work in WorldCat: an application of FRBR.” Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services 27, 1:45–59. DOI: 10.1080/14649055.2003.10765895.

Bergamin, Giovanni. 2008. “OPAC. Migliorare l’esperienza degli utenti.” Bibliotime XI, 1. http://www.aib.it/aib/sezioni/emr/bibtime/num-xi-1/bergamin.htm.

Berners-Lee, Tim. 1998. “What the Semantic Web can represent.” Last modified: September 17, 1998. https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/RDFnot.html.

Biagetti, Maria Teresa. 2010. “Nuove funzionalità degli OPAC e relevance ranking.” Bollettino AIB 50, 4:339–356. https://bollettino.aib.it/article/view/5340/5103.

Bianchini, Carlo. 2012. “Dagli OPAC ai library linked data. Come cambiano le risposte ai bisogni degli utenti.” AIB studi 52, 3:303–323. DOI: 10.2426/aibstudi-8597.

Bianchini, Carlo. 2017. “«Funziona come Google, vero?». Prima indagine sull’interazione utente catalogo nella biblioteca del Dipartimento di musicologia e beni culturali (Cremona) dell’Università di Pavia.” AIB studi 57, 1:23–49. DOI: 10.2426/aibstudi-11557.

Breeding, Marshall. 2015. The future of library resource discovery. Baltimore: NISO. https://groups.niso.org/apps/group_public/download.php/14487/future_library_resource_discovery.pdf.

Byrne, Gillian, and Lisa Goddard. 2010. “The Strongest Link. Libraries and Linked Data.” D-Lib Magazine 16, 11/12. DOI: 10.1045/november2010-byrne.

Calhoun, Karen. 2006. “The Changing Nature of the Catalog and its Integration with Other Discovery Tools”, prepared for the Library of Congress. Final Report 17 March 2006. https://www.loc.gov/catdir/calhoun-report-final.pdf.

Carroll, Jeremy, Christian Bizer, Patrick Hayes, and Patrick Stickler. 2004. “Named Graphs, Provenance and Trust.” In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on World Wide Web WWW, 613–622. DOI: 10.1145/1060745.1060835.

Coyle, Karen. 2007a. “The Library Catalog. Some Possible Futures.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 33, 3:414–416.

Coyle, Karen. 2007b. “The Library Catalog in a 2.0 World.” Journal of Academic Librarianship 33, 2:289–291.

Coyle, Karen. 2012. Linked Data Tools. Connecting on the Web. Chicago: ALA TechSource.

Coyle, Karen. 2013. “Library linked data. An evolution.” JLIS.it 4, 1:53–61. DOI: 10.4403/jlis.it-5443.

Delsey, Tom. 2009. “RDA Implementation Scenarios.”

http://www.rda-jsc.org/archivedsite/docs/5editor2rev.pdf.

Dempsey, Lorcan. 2006. “Lifting out the catalog discovery experience.” May 14. http://orweblog.oclc.org/Lifting-out-the-catalog-discovery-experience/.

Dunsire, Gordon. 2012. “Representing the FR family in the Semantic Web.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 50, 5-7:724–741. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2012.679881.

Dunsire, Gordon, Diane Hillmann, Jon Phipps, and Karen Coyle. 2011. “A Reconsideration of Mapping in a Semantic World.” In International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, 26–36. https://dcpapers.dublincore.org/pubs/article/view/3622.

Fast, Karl, and D. Grant Campbell. 2005. “‘I still like Google’: University student perceptions of searching OPACs and the Web.” In Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 41, 138–146. DOI: 10.1002/meet.1450410116.

Fons, Theodore. 2014. “Authorities, Entities & Communities.” In IFLA WLIC 2014, Lyon, 16-22 August 2014. http://library.ifla.org/1034/.

Galeffi, Agnese, and Andrea Marchitelli. 2006. “Il catalogo come learning place. Nuove competenze del bibliotecario.” In Bibliotecari al tempo di Google. Profili, competenze, formazione, Milano, 17-18 March 2016. http://eprints.rclis.org/29965/.

Guerrini, Mauro, and Tiziana Possemato. 2015. Linked data per biblioteche, archivi e musei. Perché l’informazione sia del web e non solo nel web. Milano: Bibliografica.

Halpin, Harry, Ivan Herman, and Patrick J. Hayes. 2009. “When owl:sameAs isn’t the same. An analysis of identity links on the Semantic Web.” https://www.w3.org/2009/12/rdf-ws/papers/ws21.

Harth, Andreas, Axel Polleres, and Stefan Decker. 2007. “Towards a social provenance model for the Web.” In Workshop on Principles of Provenance (PrOPr). https://aran.library.nuigalway.ie/handle/10379/527.

Hildreth, Charles R. 1987. “Beyond Boolean. Designing the Next Generation of Online Catalogs.” Library Trends 35, 4:647–667. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/4816836.pdf.

Iacono, Antonella. 2013. “Verso un nuovo modello di OPAC. Dal recupero dell’informazione alla creazione di conoscenza.” JLIS.it 4, 2:85–107. DOI: 10.4403/jlis.it-8903.

Iacono, Antonella. 2014. “Dal record al dato. Linked data e ricerca dell’informazione nell’OPAC.” JLIS.it 5, 1:77–102. DOI: 10.4403/jlis.it-9095.

La Barre, Kathryn. 2007. “Faceted Navigation and Browsing Features in New OPACs: Robust Support for Scholarly Information Seeking?.” Knowledge Organization 34, 2:78–90.

Macgregor, George, and Emma McCulloch. 2006. “Collaborative tagging as a knowledge organisation and resource discovery tool.” Library Review 55, 5:291–300. DOI: 10.1108/00242530610667558.

Manzotti, Giulia. 2010. “Analisi e riflessioni sul VIAF, Virtual International Authority File.” JLIS.it 1, 2:357–381. DOI: 10.4403/jlis.it-4520.

Marchitelli, Andrea. 2009. “Stat rosa pristina nomine? Biblioteche e cataloghi ai tempi del nuovo Web.” AIDAInformazioni 27, 3/4:31–43. http://eprints.rclis.org/14137/.

Marchitelli, Andrea. 2014. “Il catalogo connesso. Dal silos di dati al network informativo.” Biblioteche oggi 32, 6:5–15. DOI: 10.3302/0392-8586-201406-005-1.

Marchitelli, Andrea, and Giovanna Frigimelica. 2012. OPAC. Roma: Associazione italiana biblioteche.

Marchitelli, Andrea, and Tessa Piazzini. 2008. “OPAC, SOPAC e Social networking. Cataloghi di biblioteca 2.0?.” Biblioteche oggi 26, 2:82–92. http://eprints.rclis.org/10964/.

Mathes, Adam. 2004. “Folksonomies. Cooperative Classification and Communication Through Shared Metadata.” December 2004. http://adammathes.com/academic/computer-mediated-communication/folksonomies.html.

OCLC Online Catalogs. 2009. What Users and Librarians Want. An OCLC Report. OCLC: Dublin. https://www.oclc.org/content/dam/oclc/reports/onlinecatalogs/fullreport.pdf.

Salarelli, Alberto. 2014. “Sul perché, anche nel mondo dei Linked Data, non possiamo rinunciare al concetto di documento.” AIB studi 54, 2/3:279–293. DOI: 10.2426/aibstudi-10128.

Schneider, Karen G. 2006. “How OPACs Suck, Part 3: The Big Picture.” American Library Association, May 20. http://www.ala.org/tools/article/ala-techsource/how-opacs-suck-part-3-big-picture.

Tennant, Roy. 2002a. “MARC must die.” Library Journal 127, 17:26–28.

Tennant, Roy. 2002b. “MARC exit strategies.” Library Journal 127, 19:27–28.

Tennant, Roy. 2004. “A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century”, [Preprint]. http://eprints.rclis.org/5464/.

Tennant, Roy. 2007. “Lipstick on a Pig 2.0.” May 4. http://www.thedigitalshift.com/2007/05/roy-tennant-digital-libraries/lipstick-on-a-pig-2-0/.

Tennant, Roy. 2014. “The OPAC is dead.” February 6. http://www.thedigitalshift.com/2014/02/roy-tennant-digital-libraries/the-opac-is-dead/.

The University of California libraries. 2005. Rethinking How We Provide Bibliographic Services for the University of California. Final Report. https://libraries.universityofcalifornia.edu/groups/files/bstf/docs/Final.pdf.

Tillett, Barbara B. 2005. “FRBR and Cataloging for the Future.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 39, 3-4:197–205. DOI: 10.1300/J104v39n03_12.

Turbanti, Simona. 2014. “Cui prodest libraries authority work.” JLIS.it 5, 2:49–59. DOI: 10.4403/jlis.it-10062.

W3C. 2012. “OWL 2 Web Ontology Language. Primer.” Second Edition. W3C Recommendation 11 December 2012. https://www.w3.org/TR/2012/REC-owl2-primer-20121211/.

Weston, Paul Gabriele. 2006. “Il catalogo. Dalla tradizione ai nuovi servizi.” In Biblioteche e informazione nell’era digitale. Atti del convegno della IV Giornata delle biblioteche siciliane, Ragusa, 26 maggio 2006, 56–82. Associazione Italiana Biblioteche: Sezione Sicilia. http://eprints.rclis.org/19468/.

Weston, Paul Gabriele. 2011. “Dall’OPAC tradizionale ai cataloghi di nuova generazione.” In Opac, blOpac, socialOpac. Da catalogo elettronico a strumento di cooperazione e social network. Treviso: Regione del Veneto e Provincia di Treviso. http://www2.regione.veneto.it/cultura/cms/allegati/Biblioteche/Opac_blOpac_SocialOpac.pdf.

Willer, Mirna, and Gordon Dunsire. 2013. Bibliographic Information Organization in the Semantic Web. eBook. Oxford: Chandos.

Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control. 2008. On the Record. Report of The Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control. https://www.loc.gov/bibliographic-future/news/lcwg-ontherecord-jan08-final.pdf.


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Alessandra Moi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

JLIS.it is a journal of the SAGAS Department, University of Florence, published by EUM, Edizioni Università di Macerata (Italy).