The Discovery tool is a growing organism


This article sums up two years of work selecting, configuring and promoting a discovery tool. Our choices were based on our circumstances and might not be right for every library. However, they led us to a state of things which we find satisfactory, and which we are going to improve further. That is why we wish to share them with colleagues who face the same challenges daily, hoping our experience can be of help.


Discovery tool; EDS; Implementation; Cataloguing practices; E-books; Electronic resources.

Full Text:

TESTO (Italiano)




Breeding, Marshall. 2005. “Plotting a New Course for Metasearch.” Computers in Libraries 25 (2):27–29.

Breeding, Marshall. “The future of library resource discovery.” NISO White paper, February 01, 2015,

Breeding, Marshall. “Library technology guides”,

Cassidy, Erin Dorris, et al. 2014. “Student searching with EBSCO Discovery: A usability study.” Journal of electronic resources librarianship 26.1:17−35.

Chickering, F. William, and Sharon Q. Yang. 2014. “Evaluation and comparison of discovery tools: An update.” Information technology and libraries 33.2:5−30.

Enoch, Todd. 2018. “Tracking Down the Problem: The Development of a Web-Scale Discovery Troubleshooting Workflow.” The Serials Librarian 74.1-4:234−239.

Fagan, Jody Condit, et al. 2008. “Usability test results for a discovery tool in an academic library.” Information technology and libraries 31.1:83−112.

Folli, Lucia. 2014. “EBSCO Discovery Service: L’eccellenza e la qualità dei risultati per SISSA/Scuola superiore di studi avanzati di Trieste.” Biblioteche oggi Vol. 32, 2:80.

Foster, Anita K., and Jean B. MacDonald. 2013. “A tale of two discoveries: Comparing the usability of Summon and EBSCO Discovery Service.” Journal of Web Librarianship 7.1:1−19.

Francese, Enrico. 2015. “Test di usabilità sul discovery tool ‘Primo’ all’Università di Torino.” Biblioteche oggi 31.10:10.

Hanrath, Scott, and Miloche Kottman. 2015. “Use and usability of a discovery tool in an academic library.” Journal of web librarianship 9.1:1−21.

Hoeppner, Athena. 2012. “The Ins and Outs of Evaluating Web-Scale Discovery Services” Computers in Libraries 32. 3.

Lewis, Suzanne. 2016. “Reflections on Using Patrons’ Stories as Practice-Based Evidence.” Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 11.1:107−110.

Lowe, M. Sara, et al. 2017. “The Boolean is Dead, Long Live the Boolean! Natural Language versus Boolean Searching in Introductory Undergraduate Instruction.” College & Research Libraries 79, 4:517−534.

Machetti Clarissa. 2016. “Biblioteche e discovery tool: il caso OneSearch e l’ateneo di Siena”, AIB studi 56.3,

Stuart, Kenyon, Ken Varnum, and Judith Ahronheim. 2015. “Measuring journal linking success from a discovery service.” Information Technology and Libraries 34.1:52−76.

Trevenzoli, Silvia. 2013. “UniVerSe - University of Verona Search”. Biblioteche oggi Vol. 31.5,

Trombone, Antonella. 2019. “Formare e gestire collezioni con i discovery tools”, Biblioteche oggi, 37:11−19.

Wisniewski, Jeff. 2014. “Beyond the Single Search Box: Discovery Systems.” Control-Shift, Online Searcher 38.

Zani, Enrica e Quaquarelli, Maura. “Da EDS a AlmaStart: il discovery nell’Università di Bologna”, workshop “Comprendere le frammentazioni per integrarle: selezionare, gestire e conservare informazioni” organizzato da EBSCO a Milano, durante il Convegno Stelline 2019.

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2019 Annalisa Bardelli, Francesca Verga

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. is a journal of UNIFI-SAGAS published by EUM - edizioni università di macerata