Essays

The Open Access Book and the evolution of the OA


Abstract


The Open Access Book (OAB) is a product of the research that in recent years has gained its place in scientific publishing and Open Access (OA). Both have gone from initial diffidence (for different reasons) to a growing interest. In the first part of the article we present the most recent data relating to this type of publication (published ebooks, number of publishers, etc.) while in the second part the OAB phenomenon is examined within a more general evolution of the OA.


Keywords


Open Access Book; Open Acces; Scientific Publishing.

Full Text:

TESTO (Italiano)


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4403/jlis.it-12516

NBN: http://nbn.depositolegale.it/urn%3Anbn%3Ait%3Aunifi-24364

References


Abadal, Ernest, Ollé, Candela, y Redondo, Sílvia. 2018. “Publicación de monografías en acceso abierto por editoriales universitarias españolas”, El Profesional de la Informacion 27, 2:300−311. Doi: 10.3145/epi.2018.mar.08.

Adema, Janneke and Stone, Graham. 2017. Changing publishing ecologies. A landscape study of new university presses and academic-led publishing, a report to Jisc. http://repository.jisc.ac.uk/6666/1/Changing-publishing-ecologies-report.pdf.

Capaccioni, Andrea. 2014. “La monografia scientifica e le sfide dell’accesso aperto.” Aib Studi 54, 2/3:201−211. Doi: dx.doi.org/10.2426/aibstudi-10084.

Capaccioni, Andrea. 2018a. Le biblioteche dell’università. Storia, modelli, tendenze. Santarcangelo di Romagna: Maggioli.

Capaccioni, Andrea. 2018b. “Open access: per un approccio storico e critico.” Aib Studi 58 1:109−118. Doi: 10.2426/aibstudi-11752.

Cassella, Maria. 2012. Open Access e comunicazione scientifica. Milano: Editrice Bibliografica.

Castellucci, Paola. 2017. Carte del nuovo mondo. Banche dati e Open Access. Bologna: Il Mulino.

Chan, Leslie. 2018. “Asymmetry and inequality as a challenge for open access. An interview.” In Open Divide: critical studies on Open Access, editors Joachim Schöpfel and Ulrich Herb, 169−182. Sacramento (USA): Library Juice Press.

Joint COAR-UNESCO Statement on Open Access, May 9. https://www.coar-repositories.org/files/coar_unesco_oa_statement-1.pdf.

Crossick, Geoffrey. 2015. Monographs and Open Access. A report to HEFCE. 2015. http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/hefce/content/pubs/indirreports/2015/Monographs,and,open,access/2014_monographs.pdf.

Debating Open Access. 2013, edited by Nigel Vincent and Chris Wickham. London: British Academy, https://www.britac.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Debating-Open-Access-2013.pdf.

Deegan, Marilyn. 2017. Academic Book of the Future project report, a report to the AHRC & the British Library. https://academicbookfuture.files.wordpress.com/2017/06/project-report_academic-book-of-the-future_deegan2.pdf.

Delle Donne, Roberto. 2018. “L’accesso aperto, le università e le SSH.” Il Capitale culturale 17:17−45. Doi: 10.13138/2039-2362/1944.

Digital book publishing in the AAUP community survey report: Spring 2012. http://www.aupresses.org/images/stories/data/2012digitalsurveyreport.pdf.

Digital book publishing in the AAUP community survey report: 2017. http://www.aupresses.org/images/stories/data/2017digitalsurveyreport.pdf.

Elliott, Michael. 2015. “The future of the monograph in the digital era: a report to the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation.” The Journal of electronic publishing 18, 4. Doi: 10.3998/3336451.0018.407.

Emery, Christina, Lucraft, Mithu, and Morka, Agata, Pyne, Ros. 2017. “The OA effect: How does open access affect the usage of scholarly books?White paper.” Springer Nature, https://www.springernature.com/gp/open-research/journals-books/books/the-oa-effect.

Ferwerda, Eelco. 2014. “Open access monograph business models.” Insights 27:35−38. Doi: 10.1629/2048-7754.46.

Ferwerda, Eelco, and Pinter, Frances, and Stern, Niels. 2017. A landscape study on Open Access and monographs: policies, funding and publishing in eight European countries. Doi: 10.5281/zenodo.815932.

Gatti, Rupert, and Mierowsky, Marc. 2016. “Funding open access monographs. A coalition of libraries and publishers.” College & Research Libraries News 77, 9:456−459. https://crln.acrl.org/index.php/crlnews/article/view/9557/10902.

Guédon, Jean-Claude. 2017. “Open Access: toward the Internet of the mind.” Budapest Open Access Initiative, http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/open-access-toward-the-internet-of-the-mind.

Hillyer, Rebecca, Posada, Alejandro, and Albornoz, Denisse, Chan, Leslie, Okune, Angela. 2017. “Framing a situated and inclusive open science: emerging lessons from the open and collaborative science in development network.” In Ebook: expanding perspectives on open science: communities, cultures and diversity in concepts and practices: proceedings of the 21th International Conference on electronic publishing, edited by Leslie Chan and Fernando Loizides. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 18−33. Doi: 10.3233/978-1-61499-769-6-18.

Jubb, Michael. 2017. Academic Books and their Futures, a report to the AHRC and the British Library. https://academicbookfuture.files.wordpress.com/2017/06/academic-books-and-their-futures_jubb1.pdf.

Jussieu Call for Open science and bibliodiversity. 2017. http://jussieucall.org/.

Martin, Paul Eve. 2014. Open Access and the Humanities. Contexts, controversies and the future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/open-access-and-the-humanities/02BD7DB4A5172A864C432DBFD86E5FB4.

Mounier, Pierre. 2018. Towards universal open access? Why we need bibliodiversity rather than a “silver bullet”. SciELO in Perspective, 2018. https://blog.scielo.org/en/2018/08/14/towards-universal-open-access-why-we-need-bibliodiversity-rather-than-a-silver-bullet/.

Neylon, Cameron, Montgomery, Lucy, and Ozaygen, Alkim, Saunders, Neil, Pinter, Frances. 2018. The visibility of Open Access monographs in a European context: full report. https://zenodo.org/record/1230342#.W1S4G9L7TDc.

OAPEN-CH The impact of Open Access on scientific monographs in Switzerland: a project conducted by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF). http://www.snf.ch/en/funding/science-communication/oapen-ch/Pages/default.aspx.

Open Divide: critical studies on Open Access. 2018. editors Joachim Schöpfel and Ulrich Herb. Sacramento (USA): Library Juice Press.

Poynder, Richard. 2018. “Preface.” In Open Divide: critical studies on Open Access, editors Joachim Schöpfel and Ulrich Herb, 1−6. Sacramento (USA): Library Juice Press.

République Française, Ministère de lʼEnseignement supérieur, de la Recherche et de lʼInnovation. 2018. Plan national pour la science ouverte, mercredi 4 juillet. http://www.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/cid132529/le-plan-national-pour-la-science-ouverte-les-resultats-de-la-recherche-scientifique-ouverts-a-tous-sans-entrave-sans-delai-sans-paiement.html.

Schöpfel, Joachim. 2018. “The paradox of success.” In Open Divide: critical studies on Open Access, editors Joachim Schöpfel and Ulrich Herb, 58−59. Sacramento (USA): Library Juice Press.

Suber, Peter. 2012. Open Access. Cambridge (Massachusetts); London: The MIT Press.

Suber, Peter. 2018. History of Open Access. https://cyber.harvard.edu/~psuber/wiki/History_of_open_access.

Tennant, Jon. 2018. “Scholarly publishing is broken. Here’s how to fix it.” Aeon 3, https://aeon.co/ideas/scholarly-publishing-is-broken-heres-how-to-fix-it.

Towards a competitive and sustainable OA market in Europe. A study of the Open Access market and policy environment. A study prepared for the OpenAIRE 2020 project, on behalf of the Euorpean Commission. 2017. https://blogs.openaire.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/OA-market-report-28Final-13-March-201729-1.pdf.

Tsuji, Keita. 2018. “Statistics on Open Access Books Available through the Directory of Open Access Books.” International Journal of Academic Library and Information Science 6, 4:86-100, Doi: 10.14662/IJALIS2018.031.

Vincent, Nigel. 2013. “The monograph challenge.” In Debating Open Access,edited by Nigel Vincent and Chris Wickham, 107−119. London: British Academy. https://www.britac.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Debating-Open-Access-2013.pdf.

John Willinsky. 2006. The Access Principle. The case for Open Access to research and scholarship. Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Working Group on expanding access to published research. 2012. Accessibility, sustainability, excellence: how to expand access to research publications. Report of the Working Group on expanding access to published research findings. https://www.acu.ac.uk/research-information-network/finch-report-final.


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Andrea Capaccioni

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Logo Università di FirenzeLogo EUMJLIS.it is a journal of the SAGAS Department, University of Florence, published by EUM, Edizioni Università di Macerata (Italy).

ISSN: 2038-1026

Openaire Logo DOAJ seal