Articles

Online Archives for Users: premises for a Quality Reference Model


Abstract


The traditional paradigm of archival mediation had to come to grips with the web environment. If guides, inventories and indexes act as mediation tools between what is inside archives and whoever needs to access them, traditional archival finding aids are not ready to be published on the web, where users are basically free from any mediation. The starting point for rethinking the archival mediation paradigm could be the principle that “output is not input” (Sheir 2005), and the compliance to current archival standards is a necessary condition, but not sufficient to guarantee the usability of archives online. Rarely archival projects organize specific user studies to finalize language, interfaces and architectures of the new environments. The paper, based also on a huge research with user studies on an archives online prototype, aims to propose some first elements to guide the drawing of a new model, built to ensure quality to archives online in terms of user needs, experience and satisfaction, and presents the case study of evaluation of a huge archival portal based on an user-centred approach, during the formative phase.

Keywords


archives online, archival mediation, user studies, usability, quality

Full Text:

Testo (Italiano)


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4403/jlis.it-12269

NBN: http://nbn.depositolegale.it/urn%3Anbn%3Ait%3Aunifi-24381

References


Agosti, Maristella e Marta Manfioletti, Nicola Orio, Chiara Ponchia, Gianmaria Silvello. 2014. “The Evaluation Approach of IPSA@CULTURA”. In Bridging Between Cultural Heritage Institutions, a cura di Tiziana Catarci, Nicola Ferro, Antonella Poggi (atti della 9th Italian Research Conference on Digital Libraries (IRCDL)), 147-152. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

Alfier, Alessandro. 2012. Archivi on line: metafore di metafore. Il caso del portale di “Una città per gli archivi”. Consultato il 25 novembre 2016. http://www.cittadegliarchivi.it/footer/documenti-di-progetto-1/la-progettazione-del-portale-di-una-citta-per-gli-archivi.

Alfier, Alessandro. 2013a. “Gli strumenti di accesso agli archivi e le sfide del web”. Archivi & Computer. Automazione e beni culturali 23/2:113-132.

Alfier, Alessandro. 2013b. “Una città per gli archivi”. IBC. Informazioni commenti inchieste sui beni culturali 21/2. Consultato il 25 novembre 2016. http://rivista.ibc.regione.emilia-romagna.it/xw-201302/xw-201302-a0003

Alfier, Alessandro. 2015. “La conservazione degli archivi digitali: ‘brodo di coltura’ per un nuovo paradigma archivistico. Atlanti: Review for modern archival theory and practice, 25/1:193-209.

Alfier, Alessandro e Chiara Kolletzek, 2013. “Una nuova porta su Bologna. Il portale del progetto ‘Una città per gli archivi’”. Teca 4:71-84.

Alfier, Alessandro e Pierluigi Feliciati. 2013. “Cambio de paradigma en el próximo decenio: el desafío de la Web para los instrumentos de descripción de los archivos”. Tábula 16:33-49.

Antonelli, Armando. 2012. “Istantanea ‘Una città per gli archivi’: istituzioni, fatti, persone, tempi, modi, prospettive e storia di un progetto archivistico locale”. Archivi & Computer. Automazione e beni culturali 22/2:7-35.

Bianchini, Carlo e Mauro Guerrini, 2016. “RDA: uno standard di contenuto per la qualità dei dati”. JLIS.it, 7/2: 83-98. Consultato il 25 novembre 2016. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4403/jlis.it-11709

Burton, Antoinette. 2005. Archive Stories: Facts, Fictions, and the Writing of History. Durham (USA): Duke University Press.

Candela, Leonardo et. al. 2011. The digital library reference model. Deliverable number D3.2b. DL.org. Consultato il 25 novembre 2016. https://www.coar-repositories.org/files/D3-2b-Digital-Library-Reference-Model.pdf

Chapman, Joyce. 2010. “Observing Users: an Empirical Analysis of User Interaction with Online Finding Aids”. Journal of Archival Organization 8/1:4-30.

Daniels, Morgan ed Elizabeth Yakel. 2010. “Seek and You May Find: Successful Search in Online Finding Aid Systems”. American Archivist 73/2:535-568.

Dobreva, Milena ed Emma McCulloch, Duncan Birrell, Pierluigi Feliciati, Ian Ruthven, Jonathan Sykes, Yurdagül Ünal. 2010a. User and Functional Testing: Final Report. Europeana v1.0. Consultato il 25 novembre 2016. http://www.bby.hacettepe.edu.tr/yayinlar/dosyalar/User%20Functional%20Testing% 20report.pdf

Dobreva, Milena ed Emma McCulloch, Duncan Birrell, Yurdagül Ünal. Pierluigi Feliciati. 2010b. “Digital Natives and Specialised Digital Libraries: a Study of Europeana Users”. In Technological Convergence and Social Networks in Information Management, a cura di Serap Kurbanoglu, Umut Al, Phyllis Lepon Erdogan, Yasar Tonta, Nazan Uçak, 45-60 ((atti della Second International Symposium on Information Management in a Changing World (IMCW)). Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

Duff, Wendy e Penka Stoyanova. 1998. “Transforming the Crazy Quilt: Archival Displays from User’s Point of View”. Archivaria 45:44-79.

Duff, Wendy e Verne Harris, 2002. “Stories and Names: Archival Description as Narrating Records and Constructing Meanings”. Archival Science 2/3-4:263-285.

Featherstone, Mike. 2006. “Archive”. Theory Culture Society, 23/2-3:591-596.

Feliciati, Pierluigi. 2007. Dall'inventario alla descrizione degli archivi in ambiente digitale: si possono offrire agli utenti risorse efficaci? Consultato il 25 novembre 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/10760/11159

Feliciati, Pierluigi. 2012. “Ask the users, il valore aggiunto della valutazione dei sistemi informativi culturali on-line coinvolgendo gli utenti: il caso del progetto ‘Una città per gli archivi’”. Il Capitale Culturale. Studies on the Value of Cultural Heritage 5:129-144. Consultato il 25 novembre 2016. http://riviste.unimc.it/index.php/cap-cult/article/view/483.

Feliciati, Pierluigi. 2014. “Convergere a valle. Lo studio del punto di vista degli utenti degli ambienti culturali digitali e l'esperienza del progetto Una Città per gli Archivi”, in Digital Humanities: progetti italiani ed esperienze di convergenza multidisciplinare, a cura di Fabio Ciotti, 89-112. Roma: Sapienza Università Editrice. Consultato il 25 novembre 2016. http://digilab2.let.uniroma1.it/ojs/index.php/Quaderni_DigiLab /article/view/170

Feliciati, Pierluigi. 2016. "L’usabilità degli ambienti bibliotecari e archivistici digitali come requisito di qualità: contesto, modelli e strumenti di valutazione". JLIS.it. 7/1:113-130. Consultato il 25 novembre 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.4403/jlis.it-11512

Feliciati, Pierluigi e Alessandro Alfier. 2013a. “Archives online from simple access to full use: towards the development of a user-centered quality model”. Archivi & Computer. Automazione e beni culturali 23/2:98-112.

Feliciati, Pierluigi e Alfier, Alessandro. 2013b. “Archives on the Web and Users Expectations: Towards a Convergence with Digital Libraries”. Review of the National Center for Digitization 22:81-92. Consultato il 25 novembre 2016. http://elib.mi.sanu.ac.rs/files/journals/ncd/22/ncd22081.pdf

Ferro, Nicola, Silvello, Gianmaria. “From Users to Systems: Identifying and Overcoming Barriers to Efficiently Access Archival Data”. In Accessing Cultural Heritage at Scale, Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Accessing Cultural Heritage at Scale, co-located with Joint Conference on Digital Libraries 2016 (JCDL 2016), Newark, USA, June 22, 2016, a cura di Paul Clough, Paula Goodale, Maristella Agosti, Séamus Lawless. < http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1611/paper2.pdf> [last accessed 20.11.2016].

Fiormonte, Domenico. 2003. Scrittura e filologia nell’era digitale. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.

Gilliland-Swetland, Anne J. 2001. “Popularizing the Finding Aid: Exploiting EAD to Enhance Online Discovery and Retrieval in Archival Information Systems by Diverse User Groups”. Journal of Internet Cataloging 4/3-4:199-225.

Griffiths Jillian R. 2012. “Questionnaires, interviews and focus groups as means for user engagement with evaluation of digital libraries”. In User Studies for Digital Library Development, a cura di Milena Dobreva, Andy O’Dwyer e Pierluigi Feliciati, 65-74. London: Facet.

ICA. 2016. Records in Contexts: a Conceptual Model for Archival Description. Consultation Draft v0.1, september 2016. Consultato il 25 novembre 2016. http://www.ica.org/en/egad-ric-conceptual-model

ISO. 2001. ISO/IEC 9126-1:2001, Software engineering Ginevra: ISO

ISO. 2010. ISO 9241-210:2010. Ergonomics of human-system interaction -- Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems. Ginevra: ISO

Light, Michelle. 2008. The Endangerment of Trees. Irvine: University of California. Consultato il 25 novembre 2016. http://www.archivists.org/publications/proceedings/EAD@10/Light-EAD@10.pdf

Meissner, Dannies. 1997. “First Things First: Reengineering Finding Aids for Implementation of EAD”. American Archivist 60/4:372-387.

Papachristopoulos, Leonidas e Giannis Tsakonas, Michalis Sfakakis, Nikos Kleidis, Christos Papatheodorou. 2016. “The ‘Nomenclature of Multidimensionality’ in the Digital Libraries Evaluation Domain”. In Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, a cura di Norbert Fuhr, László Kovacs, Thomas Risse, Wolfgang Nejdl, 241-252 (atti della 20th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries (TPDL)). New York: Springer-Verlag.

Pons, Anaclet. 2013. El desorden digital. Guía para historiadores y humanistas. Madrid: Siglo XXI de España.

Rasmussen, Katja Guldbaek e Gitte Petersen. 2012. “Personas”. In User Studies for Digital Library Development, a cura di Milena Dobreva, Andy O’Dwyer e Pierluigi Feliciati, 105-114. London: Facet.

Ribeiro, Fernanda. 2001. “Archival Science and Changes in the Paradigm”. Archival Science 1/3:295-310.

Robertson, Craig. 2004. “The Archive, Disciplinarity and Governing: Cultural Studies and the Writing of History”. Cultural Studies/Critical Methodologies 4/4:450-471.

Schaffner, Jennifer. 2009). The Metadata Is the Interface: Better Description for Better Discovery of Archives and Special Collections, synthesized from User Studies. Dublin (Ohio): OCLC Research. Consultato il 25 novembre 2016. http://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/publications/library/2009/2009-06.pdf?urlm=162923

Scheir, Wendy. 2005. “First Entry: Report on a Qualitative Exploratory Study of Novice User Experience with Online Finding Aids”. Journal of Archival Organization 3/4:49-85.

Trombone, Antonella. 2014. “New display models of bibliographic data and resources: cataloguing/resource description and search results”. JLIS.it, 5/2:19-32. Consultato il 25 novembre 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.4403/jlis.it-10063.

Tsakonas, Giannis. 2012. “Users within the Evaluation of Digital Libraries”. In User Studies for Digital Library Development, a cura di Milena Dobreva, Andy O’Dwyer e Pierluigi Feliciati, 51-61. London: Facet.

Tsakonas, Giannis e Christos Papatheodorou. 2008. “Exploring Usefulness and Usability in the Evaluation of Open Access Digital Libraries”. Information Processing & Management 44/3:1234-1250.

Yakel, Elizabeth. 2004. “Encoded Archival Description: Are Finding Aids Boundary Spanners or Barriers for Users?”. Journal of Archival Organization, 2/1-2:63-77.

Yakel, Elizabeth et al. (2007). “Creating the Next Generation of Archival Finding Aids”. D-Lib Magazine 13/5-6. Consultato il 25 novembre 2016. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/may07/yakel/05yakel.html


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Pierluigi Feliciati, Alessandro Alfier

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

JLIS.it is a journal of the SAGAS Department, University of Florence, published by EUM, Edizioni Università di Macerata (Italy).